In today’s industrial environments, especially at major hazard facilities (MHFs), understanding and managing risk is more important than ever. As facilities grow more complex and regulations become increasingly focused on cumulative and societal risk, Quantitative Risk Assessments (QRA) are an increasingly valuable addition to the process safety toolbox, especially for complex facilities.
But the question many operators ask is: "When is the best time to use a QRA?"
A QRA is a systematic, data-driven method for quantifying the risks associated with potential hazardous events at and around a facility. Unlike scenario-based assessments that focus on individual events, QRA offers a view of cumulative risk.
QRA has sometimes had a reputation as a "black box" analysis, highly technical and hard to interpret. But when applied effectively, it offers real clarity by:
In essence, QRA complements our existing methodologies by offering a data-driven view of risk aggregation, helping you see where to act for the greatest impact.
QRA is not required for every site. However, there are clear indicators that it's time to consider one:
If you operate a major hazard facility (MHF) with numerous systems and potential major incidents, the cumulative risk may be far higher than what’s visible from individual assessments. QRA helps quantify the overall exposure and ensure the site remains within tolerable risk thresholds.
Demonstrating SFARP in Australia and New Zealand requires consideration of cumulative risk as well as individual scenarios. QRA is the tool to understand the different cumulative effects:
QRA helps address all of these by mapping and quantifying risk spatially and systemically.
QRAs are essential tools in occupied building risk assessments (OBRA), ensuring that control rooms, offices, and shelters are located and designed to protect the people inside. (More on that in THIS BLOG.)
Councils and regulators in New Zealand and Australia frequently rely on QRA outputs to:
QRA is increasingly seen as a standard approach for understanding off-site risk.
Tools like HAZOP, LOPA, and bowtie analysis are essential for identifying and managing risk at the scenario level, while QRA builds on these foundations to provide a broader, quantitative view of cumulative and societal risk. QRAs complement these methods by:
|
|
|
This INTRODUCTION TO PROCESS SAFETY online course is for all staff who work at hazardous facilities. FIND IT HERE! | Find out more about our PROCESS SAFETY INCIDENT INVESTIGATION training course HERE! | Prefer a face-to-face course? Find out about our next PROCESS SAFETY FOUNDATIONS course HERE! |
If you operate a large, complex facility with multiple potential hazards, a QRA can:
At Safety Solutions, our approach to QRA demystifies the process. We use QRA to complement, not replace, our existing tools, giving clients a clear, actionable view of site-wide risk and control effectiveness.
Whether you're navigating regulatory pressures, planning new infrastructure, or simply want greater confidence in your risk profile, QRA is a powerful method to ensure you're seeing the full picture.
Interested in learning whether QRA is right for your facility?
Reach out to the team at Safety Solutions HERE, we’re here to help.
Did you like this blog? We think you may also be interested in reading this one: How QRA Helps Ensure Your Buildings Are Actually Safe.